selkie: (Zachor by Rymenhild)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] selkie at 09:07pm on 13/01/2006
I've just finished reading A Thread of Grace, by Mary Doria Russell.

I wish I could do that, verdammte.

It was an amazing read. I cried at two points, one I would not have expected, near the end. The characterization 'made' the book, and the writing was as remarkable for its not-telling as for what was revealed. I was stunned, in the old, more literal sense of stunned. And nobody makes perfect choices and nearly everybody dies -- good people and horrible people are consigned to all different directions by fate. There's no banner character that makes it through shiny and clean. Facts and memories are revealed little by little, people vanish, things are cryptic and frustrating.

I thought I was jaded and inured to modern Holocaust literature -- my own book included, if you wondered -- but this was just breathtaking. I would have got through it in a week, but I kept putting it down because I was horrified of what might happen next.
There are 6 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
sovay: (Rotwang)
posted by [personal profile] sovay at 02:49am on 14/01/2006
I have to say that I think that book justifies its existence entirely through the character of Werner Schramm: but, yeah. I bought it because, in the last few hours of Wiscon, I picked it idly up off a shelf in the closing-down dealer's room and couldn't leave it behind. I read it on the flight back and I doubt I was very communicative while reading. The epilogue is also amazing.
 
posted by [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com at 02:55am on 14/01/2006
Werner Schramm was one of the two reasons I cried. It's that whole redemption/retribution thing. The other reason I cried was the epilogue.

Nice to see I'm not alone in my reactions.

I would have cried over Mirella Soncini and that entire cellar of children if only she (er, Mary Doria Russell) hadn't written it so gimmickily.
Nice icon, by the way.
sovay: (Lord Peter Wimsey)
posted by [personal profile] sovay at 03:13am on 14/01/2006
I had a somewhat odd reaction to the book in that its near-lack of prose style kept putting me off—which I suspect is not a sticking point for most readers, but I like style!—but I kept reading, and I was rewarded with characterization, if not detailed description. I have a somewhat feverish post about Schramm here. The epilogue really is a punch to the heart.

hadn't written it so gimmickily.

I will also confess that I had a bit of a bet on with myself over whether they would survive the war or not . . . I've since read that Russell literally flipped a coin at crucial moments in the narrative to determine who would live and who would not, so that it would be real chance rather than authorial pseudo-randomness dictating their fates, but I still agree with you.

Nice icon, by the way.

Thanks. It is courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] matociquala. I am trying to branch out on icons.
 
posted by [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com at 04:13am on 14/01/2006
I think it's a good take on Werner Schramm. I didn't read it at the time because penury forced me to wait for the paperback. *applauds now for good measure*

On a note related only to that on which I am working, how does she come up out of the sea again? I only remember that she does, indeed, have her husband with her.

If I get on AIM my brain will be sucked out and consumed, so we'll just manage things this way.
sovay: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] sovay at 04:21am on 14/01/2006
how does she come up out of the sea again? I only remember that she does, indeed, have her husband with her.

You are lucky that I have a transcription of the IM conversation which did indeed suck out my brain into this story, so . . .

And holding the hand of bone in her own hand, the fisherman's wife turns and begins, slowly, to climb back up the rope love-knotted around her waist to the world of air, the world of the land. Through the seven layers of the sea—describe them as you will—she climbs, and she does not look back. And maybe if she'd looked behind her, she'd have seen the sea reclothing her husband in his flesh, giving back everything that the sea had taken from him in his descent, layer by layer: the veins over the bone, and the sinews, and the muscle over the sinews, and the skin over that, hair and eyes and nails and clothes, until finally when she breaks the surface of the waves, she sees her husband.

But she doesn't look back, and she's so worn out from her descent and return that she can't pull herself into the little rowboat; but he can, and he helps her in; and she holds him, in the middle of the wide sea, and he holds her.

And she sees, when she pulls back enough to look into his face, that behind his eyes there is the darkness of that seventh layer of the sea, the rushing black as ancient as time; and when he speaks, she will always hear the break and tumble of the waves beneath his voice. There is a part of him that will always belong to the sea now.

But he says, with his hands,
I love you, and he is not looking at the sea but at her; and together they begin to row back to the shore.

Will that do?
 
posted by [identity profile] setissma.livejournal.com at 04:06am on 14/01/2006
I haven't read that one - been meaning to - but her other two, The Sparrow and God's Children, while, you know, having nothing to do with the holocaust, were amazingly good.

Some sensitive things, and really sad, but... Amazingly good.

February

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
            1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5 6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28