selkie: (kiss)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] selkie at 09:52pm on 05/03/2006
I feel like I should want to see Munich more. I feel like Spielberg probably wasn't the guy to direct it, because it's, you know, a morally ambiguous chapter in modern Jewish history, and we all know how well he does with that.

I feel like I should want to see The Constant Gardener more, although that's mostly because I've been spoiled for the ending.

I want a Rachel Weisz. *purrs* Luckily my wife wants one too. I want an Eric Bana! *polishes up the little bit of straight* I don't think my wife does too.

Also, Lauren Bacall wants your braaaaaaaains.

Also also, I think the film version of my book will be brilliant. When it happens. Because some smarter, more talented person will purge it of all the silly errors that impede and encumber it as a book, and just distill it to the talking and the pretty pictures.
There are 8 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] mortifyd.livejournal.com at 03:16am on 06/03/2006
Munich... eh. I don't see why I should want to see that so much really.

The Constant Gardener was pretty to look at... and completely DULL. I saw it at the theater with a free pass and was bored shitless. I'm glad I didn't pay money to see it.
 
posted by [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com at 03:19am on 06/03/2006
Hi! Hiiiiii! It's a [livejournal.com profile] mortifyd !

Thanks for letting me know, about The Constant Gardener.
 
posted by [identity profile] mortifyd.livejournal.com at 03:22am on 06/03/2006
The scenery was gorgeous, the characters... kind of annoying. The premise... left me sort of going, "yeah, and?" because exploitation of the third world isn't something new...

Do you think as Jews were obligated to see "Jewish themed" movies? Or plays? So many of them suck... there are good ones to be sure, but so many more are teh suck. Just curious really.

I have peyos again. Small ones, but I missed them.
 
posted by [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com at 03:30am on 06/03/2006
I don't think we're obligated, I just like Eric Bana and wanted to care more about a movie on a subject that interests and baffles me.

*thinks* Yeah, I think the lion's share of Jewish-themed movies are krep, mostly because directors and/or screenwriters put themselves into this, I dunno, moral straitjacket and mince around the subject. It all has to be BIG, it all has to lead to REDEMPTION, it... bleh. And so you end up with Robin Williams in Jacob the Liar and Roberto Benigni in Life is Beautiful.
sovay: (Rotwang)
posted by [personal profile] sovay at 05:06am on 08/03/2006
For what it's worth, the local storm god did like Munich, and I think he's very sensitive to bad Jewish film. I'm half-inclined to see it if only because Tony Kushner wrote the screenplay. But I'm very sensitive to bad Spielberg, so we'll see how this all works out.
 
posted by [identity profile] dopplegl.livejournal.com at 03:45am on 06/03/2006
I'm not Jewish, but I think that Munich did a fantastic job of portraying the situation in such a way that doesn't force you to see one side or another. It leaves it very ambiguous and let's the audience make up its own mind.

I think it's, at the least, worth a viewing. I really enjoyed it and thing it honestly should win over Brokeback Mountain.
 
posted by [identity profile] sibylla.livejournal.com at 04:53pm on 06/03/2006
If you get a Rachel Weisz, could I borrow her?

Just a little?

Please?
sovay: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] sovay at 05:04am on 08/03/2006
I really liked The Constant Gardener. (Keep in mind that I'm biased toward John Le Carre, not to mention Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz, but I think I can still claim a certain degree of objectivity.) Not at all in cinematography or style, but in the feel of its characters and story, it reminded me of a certain kind of film made in the 1940's and 1950's—if it hadn't been for all the vivid color and the unambiguous importance of the African landscape, so much so that the scenery was practically a character in its own right, The Constant Gardener could have been a film noir. There was something of that labyrinthine kind of plot, the characters whose loyalties and even true selves are uncertain, and the lone protagonist who is forced to change to survive—either into someone more suited to this new environment, or someone whom he might have been all along—as he navigates all the tangles that even the audience can't necessarily riddle out.

None of this is criticism. I really like film noir; and I did not find The Constant Gardener predictable, although it did offer the fun of trying to figure out where the story was headed next. I just realized a few days after viewing it that, in fact, it hadn't been as alien a kind of film as I'd first thought. But Rachel Weisz completely deserved her Oscar. She has to play a character who's initially as impenetrable to the audience as to her husband and yet she can't be a cipher, a blank—the film fails completely if she is. You have to believe in her three-dimensionally and still not be able to figure her out. That's damn tricky, and she made it work.

Also also, I think the film version of my book will be brilliant. When it happens. Because some smarter, more talented person will purge it of all the silly errors that impede and encumber it as a book, and just distill it to the talking and the pretty pictures.

I happen to think that one of the great virtues of A Verse from Babylon is its writing style, but I still really want to see it as a film. Just don't ask me to write the screenplay.

February

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
            1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5 6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28