selkie: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] selkie at 01:40pm on 19/12/2006
I think things like this.

So folic acid is in all the bread products in this country, and it’s in prenatal vitamins. I know I read something that said it was also a known agent for epigenetic changes that could go on in mice to the nth generation. So what if we attached a marker of some kind to the folic acid before the pregnant women ingested it in their vitamins, so that then we could see where it landed on the neural tube of the little jellybean proto-baby? What if folic acid as epigenetic affector is responsible for the spike in autism rates? What if it lands in different places in a developing baby’s cells and then you get a brilliant baby, or a schizophrenic baby, or the aforementioned autistic baby, or a baby with teratogenic complications the size of Cleveland?


...And then I inflict them on my wife.
There are 3 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] agoodshinkickin.livejournal.com at 06:48pm on 19/12/2006
Standard double blind?
 
posted by [identity profile] strange-selkie.livejournal.com at 06:56pm on 19/12/2006
I don't know if it would be legal. I mean implementably legal at all in a study environment. They don't like when you poke pregnant women.
 
posted by [identity profile] shirei-shibolim.livejournal.com at 10:34pm on 19/12/2006
I wonder if Australia has any unusual developmental disorder statistics. Vegemite is positively loaded with folic acid.

February

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
            1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5 6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28